|
IT400C
|
 |
« on: November 16, 2011, 12:09:25 PM » |
|
Hi Guys, I've had a clean runner KDX400A1 sitting in my garage for a couple of years now (as well as an A2 parts bike), and I've finally got to the stage where I can give it the care and attention it deserves...  Dad had one back in 1979, and always said it was the best bike he'd ever owned. So I've got this one to do up for him to do the occasional ride on. Being mainly a Yamaha man, I'm a little unsure of some of the finer details that I take for granted on my IT's etc. Things like what engine paints etc did the 79 KDX's have? - Were the Kwacka engines a Semi-Gloss Black?
- What about the hubs? Semi-Gloss?
- What about the exhaust? Flat or Semi-Gloss?
Also, anyone out there have any nice '79/'80 KDX400/250 sidecovers or mudguards? Anyne got a good KDX400A1/A2 kickstart? Or does a kickstart off another model fit and do the job? Does anyone do replica seat foams? Haha - I'm starting with a VERY low knowledge base here....  Thanks, Tony
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 16, 2011, 02:33:19 PM by IT400C »
|
Logged
|
If it wasn't for my bad habits, I'd have no habits at all....
1972 DT2MX, 1975 MX400B, 5 x 1976 IT400C, 1977 IT400D bitsa, 1979 KDX400A1, 1980 KDX400A2, 2005 KTM250EXC
|
|
|
|
IT400C
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: November 16, 2011, 12:21:44 PM » |
|
 (Sorry for the over-sharpened photo) 
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 16, 2011, 12:46:08 PM by IT400C »
|
Logged
|
If it wasn't for my bad habits, I'd have no habits at all....
1972 DT2MX, 1975 MX400B, 5 x 1976 IT400C, 1977 IT400D bitsa, 1979 KDX400A1, 1980 KDX400A2, 2005 KTM250EXC
|
|
|
|
IT400C
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: November 16, 2011, 12:48:48 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If it wasn't for my bad habits, I'd have no habits at all....
1972 DT2MX, 1975 MX400B, 5 x 1976 IT400C, 1977 IT400D bitsa, 1979 KDX400A1, 1980 KDX400A2, 2005 KTM250EXC
|
|
|
|
cyclegod
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: November 16, 2011, 01:01:17 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ban BLACK rims NOW
|
|
|
|
GMC
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: November 17, 2011, 09:08:07 AM » |
|
Good stuff. I’ve been intrigued by this model for a while now. I’ve never been a big fan of big bores as they can be big cumbersome beasts at times, especially in the bush, but from looking into this model I have found that the tank, seat, swingarm & forks are all the same as the KDX 250 which has me thinking that the 400 may feel like a torquey 250 (or the 250 feels like a big cumbersome beast)
HTH
Part # = 36001-4001-7F Part Description = SIDE COVER,LH,LIME GREEN Model Count = 3 KDX250-A1 80 250 KDX250 OFF ROAD KDX400-A1 79 390 KDX400 OFF ROAD KDX400-A2 80 390 KDX400 OFF ROAD
Part # = 36001-4002-7F Part Description = SIDE COVER,RH,LIME GREEN Model Count = 3 KDX250-A1 80 250 KDX250 OFF ROAD KDX400-A1 79 390 KDX400 OFF ROAD KDX400-A2 80 390 KDX400 OFF ROAD
Part # = 35022-4001-7F Part Description = REAR FENDER,LIME GREEN Model Count = 2 KDX250-A1 80 250 KDX250 OFF ROAD KDX400-A1 79 390 KDX400 OFF ROAD
Part # = 35004-4001-7F Part Description = FRONT FENDER,LIME GREEN Model Count = 2 KDX250-A1 80 250 KDX250 OFF ROAD KDX400-A1 79 390 KDX400 OFF ROAD
Part # = 23005-5002-7F Part Description = HEADLAMP BODY,COMPLETE,LIME GREEN Model Count = 11 KDX175-A1 80 175 KDX175 OFF ROAD KDX175-A2 81 175 KDX175 OFF ROAD KDX175-A3 82 175 KDX175 OFF ROAD KDX250-A1 80 250 KDX250 OFF ROAD KDX250-B1 81 250 KDX250 OFF ROAD KDX250-B2 82 250 KDX250 OFF ROAD KLX250-A1 79 250 KLX250 OFF ROAD KLX250-A2 80 250 KLX250 OFF ROAD KDX400-A1 79 390 KDX400 OFF ROAD KDX420-B1 81 420 KDX420 MOTOCROSS KDX450-A1 82 420 KDX450 OFF ROAD
Part # = 13064-5003 Part Description = KICK PEDAL ASSEMBLY Model Count = 9 KX250-A7 81 250 KX250 MOTOCROSS KDX400-A1 79 390 KDX400 OFF ROAD KDX400-A2 80 390 KDX400 OFF ROAD KDX420-B1 81 420 KDX420 MOTOCROSS KX420-A1 80 420 KX420 MOTOCROSS KX420-A2 81 420 KX420 MOTOCROSS KDX450-A1 82 420 KDX450 OFF ROAD KX500-A1 83 500 KX500 MOTOCROSS KX500-A2 84 500 KX500 MOTOCROSS
Part # = 53001-4002 Part Description = SEAT ASSEMBLY Model Count = 3 KDX250-A1 80 250 KDX250 OFF ROAD KDX400-A1 79 390 KDX400 OFF ROAD KDX400-A2 80 390 KDX400 OFF ROAD
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
IT400C
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: November 17, 2011, 09:44:03 AM » |
|
Dad rode an IT400F in 1979, which he liked. But then in 1979 he got the KDX400A1 and instantly fell in love with it. Guys that he struggled keeping up with on the IT, he was suddenly faster than on the KDX. He described it as the most confidence inspiring bike he'd owned. He described it as turning extremely well (steep forks), but it was very stable in the fast stuff as well (long wheelbase/swingarm). It felt very light to ride and was very well balanced too. The power was linear and it just seemed to get traction everywhere. He used to say that no matter where you were or what revs you were doing, if you wanted to go faster, you just turned the throttle a little more..  He loved it, which is why I'm restoring one for him. And me too of course... 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If it wasn't for my bad habits, I'd have no habits at all....
1972 DT2MX, 1975 MX400B, 5 x 1976 IT400C, 1977 IT400D bitsa, 1979 KDX400A1, 1980 KDX400A2, 2005 KTM250EXC
|
|
|
|
Davey Crocket
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: November 17, 2011, 10:25:53 AM » |
|
You two are dribbling lunatics 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
IT400C
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: November 17, 2011, 10:29:14 AM » |
|
You two are dribbling lunatics  Hahaha - the voice of experience..... 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If it wasn't for my bad habits, I'd have no habits at all....
1972 DT2MX, 1975 MX400B, 5 x 1976 IT400C, 1977 IT400D bitsa, 1979 KDX400A1, 1980 KDX400A2, 2005 KTM250EXC
|
|
|
|
GMC
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: November 17, 2011, 10:45:41 AM » |
|
You two are dribbling lunatics  It sure beats dribbling politics 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
firko
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: November 17, 2011, 11:12:53 AM » |
|
You two are dribbling lunatics It sure beats dribbling politics Hallelujah Geoff! It look like a sensible conversation about motorcycles to me. Go for it Tony, they're a good thing, a friend in the USA rode desert on a KDX400 and he still reckons it's one of the most overrated bikes of the late 70's early 80's.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
In a gadda da vida . '68 Yamaha DT1 enduro, '69 Yamaha 'DT1 from Hell' '69 Cheney Yamaha 360, 70 Maico 350 (2 off), '68 Hindall Ducati 250, '72 Hindall RT2MX, 70 Hindall RT1 flat tracker, Champion DT1 flat tracker, Yamaha 1T250J, Maico 250 trials, '71 Moto Islo Metisse, Boyd and Stellings TM400.
|
|
|
|
IT400C
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: November 17, 2011, 11:21:50 AM » |
|
Hallelujah Geoff! It look like a sensible conversation about motorcycles to me. Go for it Tony, they're a good thing, a friend in the USA rode desert on a KDX400 and he still reckons it's one of the most overrated bikes of the late 70's early 80's.
Yo Firko, I hope you meant to say 'underrated'... 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If it wasn't for my bad habits, I'd have no habits at all....
1972 DT2MX, 1975 MX400B, 5 x 1976 IT400C, 1977 IT400D bitsa, 1979 KDX400A1, 1980 KDX400A2, 2005 KTM250EXC
|
|
|
|
Canam370
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: November 17, 2011, 11:22:16 AM » |
|
It look like a sensible conversation about motorcycles to me. Go for it Tony, they're a good thing, a friend in the USA rode desert on a KDX400 and he still reckons it's one of the most overrated bikes of the late 70's early 80's. [/quote] So you are saying they are a poxbox Firko? 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
WANTED. Canams;all models,complete or parts.SWM stuff too!
I'm THE Thread Killer - when I post a thread dies!
|
|
|
|
bigk
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: November 17, 2011, 01:20:36 PM » |
|
I have a magazine test on one and it reads pretty good. K
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
firko
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: November 17, 2011, 02:25:34 PM » |
|
Go for it Tony, they're a good thing, a friend in the USA rode desert on a KDX400 and he still reckons it's one of the most overrated bikes of the late 70's early 80's. Doh! Another Homer moment, brought to you by Acme brand Early Onset Dementia.  In a burst of rabid excitement at the thought of leaving the house in the pissing rain to do my weekly shopping at the mall, I wrote the post and hit send without my usual pre send edit. Underrated was of course what I mean't.  I actually considered turning one of these KDX puppies into an Evo racer a few years ago. I'd acumulated most of the bits from various Kawasaki models but in the end I figured I had way too many bikes so it got shuffled onto eBay . Doesn't Simon Healy race a KDX based bike in Evo in Viper?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
In a gadda da vida . '68 Yamaha DT1 enduro, '69 Yamaha 'DT1 from Hell' '69 Cheney Yamaha 360, 70 Maico 350 (2 off), '68 Hindall Ducati 250, '72 Hindall RT2MX, 70 Hindall RT1 flat tracker, Champion DT1 flat tracker, Yamaha 1T250J, Maico 250 trials, '71 Moto Islo Metisse, Boyd and Stellings TM400.
|
|
|
|
JohnnyO
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: November 17, 2011, 02:55:40 PM » |
|
Firko that Evo bike that Simon built is a KX250A5 with the KDX400 engine and it now belongs to Rusty. It's a good thing.. i had a ride on it a few weeks ago.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bigk
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: November 17, 2011, 04:13:35 PM » |
|
That's the 2nd one John, the REAL one is still with Simon undergoing preparation for next season. K
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
holeshot buddy
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: November 17, 2011, 10:54:50 PM » |
|
thats right simon still has his original one which is due for a birthday makeover  simon built mine i just finished off the easy bits i would have to say its the best twin shock bike i have ever ridden by far great motor unreal bottom end and midrange and rides like its on rails 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
follow me to first turn
|
|
|
|
JohnnyO
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: November 17, 2011, 11:15:49 PM » |
|
i would have to say its the best twin shock bike i have ever ridden by far great motor unreal bottom end and midrange and rides like its on rails  Except for a Maico 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
holeshot buddy
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: November 18, 2011, 12:29:14 AM » |
|
ha ha no its better than a 490 maico 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
follow me to first turn
|
|
|
|
shorelinemc
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: November 19, 2011, 11:30:35 AM » |
|
and if any one gets excited i have one for sale 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Trent Farlow
Novice

Posts: 44
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: November 20, 2011, 08:15:34 PM » |
|
This is for KDX fans. There is some interesting history on the KDX400 and its great engine. The KDX400 has to be one of the most under rated bikes of the Evo period. All tests of the period were lavish in their praise of it. It was designed in the USA by Americans and was built in the new Kawasaki factory in Lincoln, Nebraska. The engine was shipped in complete from Japan, as was the swingarm and wheels etc but the tank and plastics were sourced in the USA - which probably explains why the KDX400 plastics did not wear well compared to other Kaw plastic of the same era. It had stump pulling power and could reach almost a hundred miles an hour tapped out.
Brad Lackey joined Kawasaki in late 1978. In his first months with Kawasaki, Brad initially practiced on a twinshock open class works bike which looked like a KX250A5 from a distance, however in common with most works bikes it was actually nothing like an A5, but was powered by a 390cc modified KDX400 engine. This was while waiting for his new works Unitrak to be built and flown in to the USA.
The KDX400 powered twinshock works bike was successful and a second one was used by Gaylon Mosier in the USA. If you look at Brads book - Motocross - techniques training and tactics - there are quite a few photos of him riding it. When the works Unitrak arrived Brad parked the twinshock 390 and it was purchased by Kawasaki UK and shipped to the UK for use by future 3 time world champ Dave Thorpe. Dave Thorpe used it for several months in the UK and did very well. He only stopped riding it when his own works Unitrak arrived in April or May 1979. Both the Mosier 390 and the Lackey/Thorpe 390 still survive to this day. To make the engine more MX orientated Kawasaki changed the pipe, jetting, ported the cylinder and changed the gearing and once installed in a more MX orientated frame and suspension it did the business.
So the humble KDX400 has some history.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
JohnnyO
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: November 20, 2011, 09:52:10 PM » |
|
Interesting stuff Trent...where did you find that info?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
firko
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: November 20, 2011, 09:59:13 PM » |
|
Good stuff Trent, what a relief to have an interesting bit of motocross history instead of the doom and gloom over at Politics Central elsewhere on the forum. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
In a gadda da vida . '68 Yamaha DT1 enduro, '69 Yamaha 'DT1 from Hell' '69 Cheney Yamaha 360, 70 Maico 350 (2 off), '68 Hindall Ducati 250, '72 Hindall RT2MX, 70 Hindall RT1 flat tracker, Champion DT1 flat tracker, Yamaha 1T250J, Maico 250 trials, '71 Moto Islo Metisse, Boyd and Stellings TM400.
|
|
|
|
crankpin
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: November 20, 2011, 10:03:07 PM » |
|
Makes me want to build one myself 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
JohnnyO
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: November 20, 2011, 10:36:13 PM » |
|
Makes me want to build one myself  After riding a similar bike recently i'd say that would be a good move mate.. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
crankpin
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: November 20, 2011, 10:39:56 PM » |
|
Got an engine for sale anyone? 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
firko
|
 |
« Reply #26 on: November 20, 2011, 10:54:05 PM » |
|
It's probably a silly question but does the KDX400 engine bolt into the A5 frame or is it a bit more difficult than that?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
In a gadda da vida . '68 Yamaha DT1 enduro, '69 Yamaha 'DT1 from Hell' '69 Cheney Yamaha 360, 70 Maico 350 (2 off), '68 Hindall Ducati 250, '72 Hindall RT2MX, 70 Hindall RT1 flat tracker, Champion DT1 flat tracker, Yamaha 1T250J, Maico 250 trials, '71 Moto Islo Metisse, Boyd and Stellings TM400.
|
|
|
|
JohnnyO
|
 |
« Reply #27 on: November 20, 2011, 11:02:58 PM » |
|
It's probably a silly question but does the KDX400 engine bolt into the A5 frame or is it a bit more difficult than that?
Goes straight in i believe Firko
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
holeshot buddy
|
 |
« Reply #28 on: November 20, 2011, 11:20:51 PM » |
|
hey firko i just put some current photos of my bike on the ning site go have a look  rusty 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
follow me to first turn
|
|
|
|
cloggy
|
 |
« Reply #29 on: November 21, 2011, 06:21:30 AM » |
|
The swingarm was supposed to be built in the USa and was also used on the KLX
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
TM bill
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: November 21, 2011, 06:43:33 AM » |
|
Looks great Rusty , what pipe did you use ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
IT400C
|
 |
« Reply #31 on: November 21, 2011, 09:51:38 AM » |
|
It's probably a silly question but does the KDX400 engine bolt into the A5 frame or is it a bit more difficult than that?
The KDX400 was produced for 2 years (79 & 80) - I've been told that the A2 (1980) engine is easier to fit - the cases changed slightly between 79 and 80 at the rear engine mount area. It's an A1 I'm restoring, but I do have an A2 parts bike in the shed... Sorry, wasn't planning on selling it though... 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If it wasn't for my bad habits, I'd have no habits at all....
1972 DT2MX, 1975 MX400B, 5 x 1976 IT400C, 1977 IT400D bitsa, 1979 KDX400A1, 1980 KDX400A2, 2005 KTM250EXC
|
|
|
|
IT400C
|
 |
« Reply #32 on: November 21, 2011, 02:02:44 PM » |
|
Has anyone tried the DC Plastics for the KDX?
From past experience they can be a bit hit and miss. They look ok in the photos on their website, but....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If it wasn't for my bad habits, I'd have no habits at all....
1972 DT2MX, 1975 MX400B, 5 x 1976 IT400C, 1977 IT400D bitsa, 1979 KDX400A1, 1980 KDX400A2, 2005 KTM250EXC
|
|
|
|
cyclegod
|
 |
« Reply #33 on: November 21, 2011, 02:17:48 PM » |
|
The colour has a lot to do with how good/bad DC stuff is the green looks to be one of the better ones but if its not to your taste then try http://www.nightmare-racing.com/index.htm
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ban BLACK rims NOW
|
|
|
|
JohnnyO
|
 |
« Reply #34 on: November 21, 2011, 03:41:27 PM » |
|
I have DC plastics on my 250A5.. they are rough, the moulds are not good and the sidecovers had to be heated and bent to get to fit properly. I'd much rather the Nightmare Racing plastics but these came with the bike.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
IT400C
|
 |
« Reply #35 on: November 21, 2011, 03:45:56 PM » |
|
I'd rather the Nightmare stuff too, but near as I can tell, they don't make anything for the KDX400 - both guards and sidecovers are unique to the 79/80 model KDX400/250 only...
Btw, I believe the KDX petrol tank was made by Don Vesco - it even runs a Vesco petrol tap as standard...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If it wasn't for my bad habits, I'd have no habits at all....
1972 DT2MX, 1975 MX400B, 5 x 1976 IT400C, 1977 IT400D bitsa, 1979 KDX400A1, 1980 KDX400A2, 2005 KTM250EXC
|
|
|
|
firko
|
 |
« Reply #36 on: November 21, 2011, 03:52:28 PM » |
|
More questions.....  What's the advantage in using an A5 frame over the stocker? When I was considering my KDX project I only had an engine and intended on using a KLX 250 frame and Yamaha forks/twin leader drum and Fox shox. I figure the rarity of suitable A5 donor bikes would make it difficult so would a suitably upgraded stock KDX frame cut it?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
In a gadda da vida . '68 Yamaha DT1 enduro, '69 Yamaha 'DT1 from Hell' '69 Cheney Yamaha 360, 70 Maico 350 (2 off), '68 Hindall Ducati 250, '72 Hindall RT2MX, 70 Hindall RT1 flat tracker, Champion DT1 flat tracker, Yamaha 1T250J, Maico 250 trials, '71 Moto Islo Metisse, Boyd and Stellings TM400.
|
|
|
|
holeshot buddy
|
 |
« Reply #37 on: November 21, 2011, 09:27:17 PM » |
|
hi bill its a modified kx420 pipe firko the klx frame is ok to use very similar i think there is more bracing on kx frame trent would know  i would love gmc to make me a pipe but he is too far away :'(
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 21, 2011, 09:30:16 PM by holeshot buddy »
|
Logged
|
follow me to first turn
|
|
|
|
GMC
|
 |
« Reply #38 on: November 21, 2011, 09:46:41 PM » |
|
i would love gmc to make me a pipe but he is too far away :'(
Not true. The main problem as I see it is that your too far away 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Trent Farlow
Novice

Posts: 44
|
 |
« Reply #39 on: November 22, 2011, 12:01:05 AM » |
|
Firko - use the KX A5 frame - it has excellent geometery and adding the bigger engine just makes it feel even more planted. I do not know about using a KLX frame but would guess it would fit. Rusty and Simon Healy have proved the concept with their success on them. The KDX frame is longer and does not have MX geometery, feels long on a track. Plus the KDX is a big bike when you sit on it, compared to the A5 which feels small. Although the fat thick KDX seat is a real pleasure. The engine almost drops into the A5 frame, you need revised engine mounting plates, and you have to machine down the steel collars in the rear engine mount where the swingarm bolt goes through , as the A5 has a smaller gap between the two swingarm inner pivots than the Unitrak which is larger. The 1980 KDX400A2 uses KX420 cases - these are an easier fit than the 1979 KDX400A1 which uses a bracket to connect the motor to the swingarm.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|