OZVMX.COM
May 21, 2013, 07:17:52 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: XR600 or 400 ?  (Read 527 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
evo550
Legend
*****
Posts: 1699


View Profile
« on: August 02, 2012, 09:36:55 PM »

I'm looking at getting myself one of these to do a bit of trail riding on (very open)
Anyone have any experience with either of ?
Hop ups that work well?
Ect.
Logged
tony27
Legend
*****
Posts: 1074



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 03, 2012, 05:00:00 AM »

Go the 400, newer bike & lighter than the 600 by quite a bit
Logged
Rossvickicampbell
Legend
*****
Posts: 2430



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: August 03, 2012, 08:40:39 AM »

600/650 will pull redwood trees from the ground but a big and heavy bike as Tony has said.
Logged

1974 Yamaha YZ360B
Changed my mind again - now I want a 1977 RM370B?
Viper79
A-Grade
****
Posts: 301



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 03, 2012, 09:46:57 AM »

I have had both. The 600 delivers most of its power right from idle to mid range which makes it a bit of a hand full on steep hills, all it wants to do is stand up on the back wheel with just the slightest turn of the throttle. Its a bit like a tractor..
The 400 delivers most of its power mid range to top end which makes it a dream on hills, even if you get into trouble half way up a hill and have to button off, you just hit the throttle and it will just keep climbing. They just love climbing hills.
The 400 is a lot lighter and slimmer than the 600.   In my opinion the 400 is the better bike by far.
They apparently had a slight problem with second gear which was rectified after the 2000 model... I have a 2001 which I have had from 2002 without one issue.   
Logged
fatboyracing
A-Grade
****
Posts: 349


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: August 06, 2012, 05:51:30 AM »

I have a 1985 600 great bike there is not a hill it wont go up a bit heavy but you will get used to it.
Great fun bike

fatboy
Logged
mavman4200p
B-Grade
***
Posts: 230



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: August 06, 2012, 10:51:24 PM »

Had a 1996 400 and thought it was good enough to buy another in 1999 rode 600s as well, if riding tighter stuff 400, if riding desert either is good, 600 had a cough stall problem in tight bush when I was ridin one pain in the arse in a corner it would bog down slightly it would cough and stall 400 didnt have same problem seems to be plenty 400s around at a fair price 600s short on the ground.
« Last Edit: August 06, 2012, 10:53:02 PM by mavman4200p » Logged

"You have not made any mistakes if you find extra pieces after assembling an object. In fact you have just found a way to make the object more efficient."
evo550
Legend
*****
Posts: 1699


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: August 06, 2012, 11:43:43 PM »

Thanks Gents,
I had a '03 400 lined up...perfect....till I started asking Q's about vin numbers and outstanding finance, and the deal turned to shit Tongue
So with cash burning a hole in my pocket, I walked past a rego'd KTM 250 exc 2t and took it....what was I thinking Huh
Logged
tony27
Legend
*****
Posts: 1074



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: August 07, 2012, 05:09:19 AM »

Smartly I'd say  Grin
Logged
sa63
C-Grade
**
Posts: 130



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: August 07, 2012, 07:29:09 AM »

thats what I have Brendon (ktm 250 2t), I love it, but im also a lover of singletrack - the motor will be pretty busy in the open stuff..300 kit??
Logged
evo550
Legend
*****
Posts: 1699


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: August 07, 2012, 01:23:36 PM »

..300 kit??
What a bloody good idea Sean, I had a 250 sx before I left QLD and I always wanted to fit a 300 kit...torque monster. Smiley Smiley
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!